The Poetist

A number of people continue to ask me, now that John Edwards is out of the race, who will I vote for/who might JRE endorse? It’s been reported by this point that both Obama and Clinton have sought an Edwards endorsement, but it’s not clear if/when he will. I can’t really speak to the possibilities of his endorsement but I can discuss who I would like to vote for in the NC primary.

If I were a single-issue voter I would hands-down vote for Hillary Clinton. Health care is a huge issue for me. While her plan admittedly isn’t the most ideal – especially given her ties to the health insurance industry – it is stronger than Obama’s plan. A major weakness in his plan is that there is no mandate – which means health insurance is optional. So whatever plan he puts into effect, the people who bought insurance will be punished when their rates increase as a result of the people who didn’t buy it but still have access to emergency care; which is one of the main problems with the existing system. What really gets me is that even if Obama changed his mind, he has already made it politically impossible for himself to adopt a more universal plan with a mandate. When Obama attacked the JRE plan (and as a corollary, the Clinton plan) from the Right, essentially using Republican talking points for his criticism, he burned the bridge for universal health care in an Obama administration. That really pissed me off. If you want to ‘reach across the aisle’ to people who don’t want to help you, that’s fine. But if you’re going to join them in attacking solid policy emanating from your own party then just cross the ‘aisle’ and let’s get on with it.

But I digress. I’m not a single-issue voter… I’m slightly torn because I think Hillary would make a more stable and competent executive and while I think it’s great that Barack – excuse me – the Barackstar, is so popular that celebrities are making music videos for him, I don’t know if that translates to effective leadership in Washington. One of my big brothers, who is an enthusiastic Obama supporter, told me that he believes if Obama can unite so many voters across such a broad spectrum he’ll probably be able to do it in Washington as well. I remain skeptical. It’s one thing to be the voice of people who previously felt like no one represented them; it’s quite another to challenge entrenched, powerful interests with warm and fuzzy phrases like “yes we can.” But I do hope my brother is right, and that Obama doesn’t get run over by the conservatives in Congress and the Supreme Court.

I fear that Obama might get run over by the Democratic Party as well. One of the things that initially drew me to him after his speech before the DNC in 2004 was that he baldly spoke out against the stigma that “a black child with a book is acting white.” This is an issue very personal to my family as boosting ‘minority achievement’ is something for which both of my parents have volunteered hundreds (thousands maybe?) of hours. I and my siblings have been those token black students in the AP classes in high school and at not-so-diverse institutions of higher learning. When he made that statement I was like yeah! Finally – somebody is talking about this! And then it disappeared; but what a missed opportunity. Sure that wasn’t on the nation’s collective consciousness, but neither was poverty – before JRE made it an issue. Universal health care wasn’t an option – until JRE proved it was possible. Barack Obama had the chance to address real issues that are holding back a lot of individuals in this country. He could have taken on stigmas that go beyond de facto academic segregation in schools; he had the platform to make it an issue, but he didn’t. So I wonder what other convictions he’d be willing to shed to remain the darling of the Democratic party.

On the other hand, I believe that Hillary Clinton would be willing to tear apart the Democratic party in order to get ahead. I believe her priorities are 1) Hillary Clinton; 2) the Clinton machine; 3) the American special interests; 4) the American people. Case in point, her vote to designate Iran as terrorist organization (or whatever that issue was, it’s been a while). There she was saying that we should stand up to Bush, etc, and then she goes and votes with along with him on his chronic war-mongering. I personally think she did it to ingratiate herself with the conservatives for the general election. And now she’s trying to get the votes/delegates of Michigan and Florida to count even though they violated their agreement with the DNC and were punished pursuant to that agreement. Yes, it’s unfair to the people of those states that they’re being put in the middle of the the DNC’s dirty laundry but they need to take that up with their state leadership that decided to flaunt the rules. Furthermore, what about the people who didn’t vote because their votes wouldn’t be counted? Might it be unfair to them to assure them their vote would not be counted, thereby strongly discouraging voter participation, and then count the vote? I think Hillary is only fighting that fight because she wants those delegates.

And did I mention that a vote for Barack Obama is a vote for nuclear power? Because it is. And I am soooooo anti nuclear power. If we’re going to invest money to make it ’safe’ as Obama has suggested, why don’t we invest in energy that is truly safe and renewable? Because IL nuclear power companies have invested strongly in his campaign, that’s why. To Hillary’s credit, she does not support nuclear power.

As it stands, I think that hypothetically Hillary Clinton would be a good executive, but with the exception of health care I’m not so trusting of her or her policy choices. I respect that Barack Obama has inspired so many people to participate in the political process, I think that’s fantastic; but I’m not convinced about his policy choices either, or his ability to stand his ground. And I must say, I’m not committed to politics; I’m much more a believer in policy. I believe that sound policy, when communicated well and sufficiently funded, is really what can change lives.

(All) that being said… I’ll probably support Obama in the NC primary (ahem, once I register to vote). I do believe that we need change – although I don’t necessarily believe that Obama will bring it. My hope is that all the people he has inspired to vote will remain a part of the process and begin to change it from the grassroots level, that they’ll call their congressmen and women to hold them accountable, that they’ll become more engaged in policy discussions, and that they’ll be motivated to do more than cast their vote. I don’t think Obama represents ‘change we can believe in’, but the individuals that support him do.

Last Thursday night the Democratic presidential hopefuls convened at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas – Dodd, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Kucinich, and Biden.

There’s been so much Edwards/Obama vs. Clinton hype the sparks flew as soon as the debate opened. Apparently people were watching Hillary to see how she reacted to barbs from the boys, and the duo to see how aptly they could gain an edge over Lady Clinton. That’s a tough line to walk and they kind of went overboard in the beginning. As Edwards expressed it later, ‘it’s not personal. The voters need to know the difference between the candidates.’ That’s a good point. People often complain that they can’t tell candidates apart, but then when they try to point out differences they get lambasted for not focusing on the issues.

Overall I felt like Edwards and Biden stood out with good policies and clear heads. Obama got bogged down when he tried to spar with Hillary but overall I think his attitude and perspective came out very clear and that’s where I think his strengths lie.

On to the issues…

Energy – Obama got a question about nuclear waste deposits in Yucca Mountain, not excessively far from Las Vegas. Apparently Obama voted against it and one of the audience members asked him where they should put it. That was a good question, and this speaks to one of my probems with Obama, that he’s not progressive enough on alternative energy sources. The conversation went something like this:
audience member – you voted against depositing nuclear waste in Yucca mountain and while your home state, Illinois, gets 40% of its energy from nuclear power you don’t want to put it in your backyard either. So, if not in your backyard, whose?
Obama – I think we can come up with new technology to deal with this.
Wolf Blitzer – but what if we can’t? Or at least what do you do until that point?
Obama – I take issue with the fact that you keep asking what if we can’t. I think we can. I wouldn’t be in this race if I didn’t think we could solve these problems.

That’s why I love Obama, but I’m still not sure about him. He’s right that there are solutions to problem that people think are intractable. He is, however, not visionary enough when it comes to energy and the environment. In my opinion supporting nuclear energy is wrong. Instead of putting a lot of resources into developing new technology to handle nuclear waste so that we can create more, we should certainly address the existing problem of nuclear waste but also put resources into renewable energy sources so that dealing with excessive waste and pollution as an energy byproduct becomes a thing of the past. Right attitude, wrong solution.

Dodd, bless his heart, was the sole candidate who emphasized that the American people would have to make sacrifices to acheive energy independence. 

Abortion – There was another outstanding one-off comment from Kucinich later on.  The question was about ensuring the placement of a pro-abortion justice on the Supreme Court and while all the candidates supported Roe v. Wade and the right to privacy, Kucinich was the only one who even mentioned the importance of birth control, pre-natal care, post-natal care, and the role they should play in the abortion debate.  That was quite possibly the sanest and most respectable answer I heard all evening.

I (obviously) didn’t take copious notes, and I’m sure there is a lot I forgot in the 5 or so days it took me to finish this post, but there is one more anecdote I’d like to share, on the subject of war.  I don’t remember who, but one candidate talked about how it’s great that candidates learn from their mistakes when endorsing policies, etc, but how wonderful things could be if candidates got their answers right ‘the first time.’  Case in point (mine, not his) Hillary Clinton approved the war in Iraq from the beginning while Obama had the forethought to vote against it.  That’s important.  At this point most of the war’s former supports now see it as a mistake… but what would the world be like if politicians and policy-makers had gotten that right the first time? 

Well, what’s done is done but that doesn’t mean lessons can’t be learned.  Even Hillary, who often seems to me to be the most centrist of the candidates, declared a number of times that democrats need to have the courage to “stand up” to Bush and Cheney.  One of the questions posed from the audience was essentially ‘what does it look like to learn the lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan?  What can be done to prevent the same mistakes from being committed?’  Both Biden and Edwards highlighted a recent vote in the Senate to designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization.  That’s the first step towards starting a war against Iran; a designation supported by Bush, Cheney and the neo-cons.  Biden voted against this (Obama couldn’t vote because he was on the campaign trail).  Hilary… who urges democrats to stand up to the neo-cons… voted in favor of the resolution.  That’s a great illustration of why I don’t trust her and why I fully support highlighting the differences between candidates.

Barack Obama’s Address to the Jefferson Jackson Dinner 2007
Veterans Memorial Auditorium
Des Moines, Iowa
November 10, 2007

Thank you so much. To the great Governor of Iowa and Lieutenant Governor of Iowa. To my dear friend Tom Harkin for the outstanding work that he does. To the congressional delegation of Iowa that is doing outstanding work, and to Nancy Pelosi, Madam Speaker — thank you all for the wonderful welcome and the wonderful hospitality.

A little less than one year from today, you will go into the voting booth, and you will select the President of the United States of America.

Now, here’s the good news — the name George W. Bush will not be on the ballot. The name of my cousin Dick Cheney will not be on the ballot. (We’ve been trying to hide that for a long time. Everybody has a black sheep in the family.) The era of Scooter Libby justice, and Brownie incompetence, and Karl Rove politics will finally be over.

But the question you’re going to have to ask yourself when you caucus in January and you vote in November is, “What’s next for America?”

We are in a defining moment in our history. Our nation is at war. The planet is in peril. The dream that so many generations fought for feels as if it’s slowly slipping away. We are working harder for less. We’ve never paid more for health care or for college. It’s harder to save, and it’s harder to retire. And most of all, we’ve lost faith that our leaders can or will do anything about it.

We were promised compassionate conservatism, and all we got was Katrina and wiretaps. We were promised a uniter, and we got a President who could not even lead the half of the country that voted for him. We were promised a more ethical and more efficient government, and instead we have a town called Washington that is more corrupt and more wasteful than it was before. And the only mission that was ever accomplished is to use fear and falsehood to take this country to a war that should have never been authorized and should have never been waged.

It is because of these failures that America is listening, intently, to what we say here today — not just Democrats, but Republicans and Independents who’ve lost trust in their government but want to believe again.

And it is because of these failures that we not only have a moment of great challenge, but also a moment of great opportunity. We have a chance to bring the country together in a new majority — to finally tackle problems that George Bush made far worse but that had festered long before George Bush ever took office — problems that we’ve talked about year after year after year after year.

And that is why the same old Washington textbook campaigns just won’t do in this election. That’s why not answering questions because we are afraid our answers won’t be popular just won’t do. That’s why telling the American people what we think they want to hear instead of telling the American people what they need to hear just won’t do. Triangulating and poll-driven positions because we’re worried about what Mitt or Rudy might say about us just won’t do. If we are really serious about winning this election, Democrats, we can’t live in fear of losing it.

This party — the party of Jefferson and Jackson, of Roosevelt and Kennedy — has always made the biggest difference in the lives of the American people when we led, not by polls, but by principle; not by calculation, but by conviction; when we summoned the entire nation to a common purpose — a higher purpose. And I run for the Presidency of the United States of America because that’s the party America needs us to be right now.

A party that offers not just a difference in policies, but a difference in leadership.

A party that doesn’t just focus on how to win but why we should.

A party that doesn’t just offer change as a slogan, but real, meaningful change — change that America can believe in.

That’s why I’m in this race. That’s why I am running for the Presidency of the United States of America — to offer change that we can believe in.

I am in this race to tell the corporate lobbyists that their days of setting the agenda in Washington are over. I have done more than any other candidate in this race to take on lobbyists — and won. They have not funded my campaign; they will not get a job in my White House; and they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I am President.

I’m in this race to take those tax breaks away from companies that are moving jobs overseas and put them in the pockets of hard working Americans who deserve it. And I won’t raise the minimum wage every ten years — I will raise it to keep pace so that workers don’t fall behind.

That is why I am in it. To protect the American worker. To fight for the American worker.

I’m in this race because I want to stop talking about the outrage of 47 million Americans without health care and start actually doing something about it. I expanded health care in Illinois by bringing Democrats and Republicans together. By taking on the insurance industry. And that is how I will make certain that every single American in this country has health care they can count on. And I won’t do it twenty years from now. I won’t do it ten years from now. I will do it by the end of my first term as President of the United States of America.

I run for President to make sure that every American child has the best education that we have to offer — from the day they are born to the day they graduate from college. And I won’t just talk about how great teachers are — as President, I will reward them for their greatness — by raising salaries and giving them more support. That’s why I’m in this race.

I am running for President because I am sick and tired of Democrats thinking that the only way to look tough on national security is by talking, and acting, and voting like George Bush Republicans.

When I am this party’s nominee, my opponent will not be able to say that I voted for the war in Iraq; or that I gave George Bush the benefit of the doubt on Iran; or that I supported Bush-Cheney policies of not talking to leaders that we don’t like. And he will not be able to say that I wavered on something as fundamental as whether or not it is OK for America to torture — because it is never ok. That’s why I am in it.

As President, I will end the war in Iraq. We will have our troops home in sixteen months. I will close Guantanamo. I will restore habeas corpus. I will finish the fight against Al Qaeda. And I will lead the world to combat the common threats of the 21st century — nuclear weapons and terrorism; climate change and poverty; genocide and disease. And I will send once more a message to those yearning faces beyond our shores that says, “You matter to us. Your future is our future. And our moment is now.”

America, our moment is now.

Our moment is now.

I don’t want to spend the next year or the next four years re-fighting the same fights that we had in the 1990s.

I don’t want to pit Red America against Blue America; I want to be the President of the United States of America.

And if those Republicans come at me with the same fear-mongering and swift-boating that they usually do, then I will take them head on. Because I believe the American people are tired of fear and tired of distractions and tired of diversions. We can make this election not about fear, but about the future. And that won’t just be a Democratic victory; that will be an American victory.

And that is a victory America needs right now.

I am not in this race to fulfill some long-held ambitions or because I believe it’s somehow owed to me. I never expected to be here. I always knew this journey was improbable. I’ve never been on a journey that wasn’t.

I am running in this race because of what Dr. King called “the fierce urgency of now.” Because I believe that there’s such a thing as being too late. And that hour is almost upon us.

I don’t want to wake up four years from now and find out that millions of Americans still lack health care because we couldn’t take on the insurance industry.

I don’t want to see that the oceans have risen a few more inches. The planet has reached a point of no return because we couldn’t find a way to stop buying oil from dictators.

I don’t want to see more American lives put at risk because no one had the judgment or the courage to stand up against a misguided war before we sent our troops into fight.

I don’t want to see homeless veterans on the streets. I don’t want to send another generation of American children to failing schools. I don’t want that future for my daughters. I don’t want that future for your sons. I do not want that future for America.

I’m in this race for the same reason that I fought for jobs for the jobless and hope for the hopeless on the streets of Chicago; for the same reason I fought for justice and equality as a civil rights lawyer; for the same reason that I fought for Illinois families for over a decade.

Because I will never forget that the only reason that I’m standing here today is because somebody, somewhere stood up for me when it was risky. Stood up when it was hard. Stood up when it wasn’t popular. And because that somebody stood up, a few more stood up. And then a few thousand stood up. And then a few million stood up. And standing up, with courage and clear purpose, they somehow managed to change the world.

That’s why I’m running, Iowa — to give our children and grandchildren the same chances somebody gave me.

That’s why I’m running, Democrats — to keep the American Dream alive for those who still hunger for opportunity, who still thirst for equality.

That’s why I’m asking you to stand with me; that’s why I’m asking you to caucus for me; that’s why I am asking you to stop settling for what the cynics say we have to accept. In this election — in this moment — let us reach for what we know is possible. A nation healed. A world repaired. An America that believes again. Thank you very much everybody.

———-

*the subject of an email sent by info@barackobama.com

The Chinese footpoot growing across Africa (The International Herald Tribune)

This article highlights evidence of the growing involvement of Chinese individuals and organizations in the development of Africa. I’m not surprised at this, to me it’s inevitable. The rich western nations aren’t the only ones with money; they don’t have a monopoly on aid, or funds for business and infrastructure development. If they continue to act like they do they will really be left behind when the rest of the world successfully partners with African nations and the political capital of the G8 and international goodwill towards them sharply plummets. The author made an interesting observation that the bulk of the western presence in Africa is aid workers, researchers and the like; while the Chinese presence is comprised of business people and investors. He noted that the West often regards Africa as a place of failure, while Chinese people see it as a place of opportunity. The G8 countries are becoming political dinosaurs of archaic thinking; and their days are numbered.