jump to navigation

A Crazy Coincidence November 29, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in Back in the U.S.A..
add a comment

It couldn’t be him.  The hair was the same – distinctive dreadlocks pulled back into a ponytail… the height and build seemed familiar to me… and the guy I know also had glasses… but the guy I know lives in Tokyo!  So of course it wasn’t him.  I mean, what are the odds that while I’m sitting in the Borders cafe in Chapel Hill a friend from Tokyo would be browsing the magazines?  Absolutely impos….

Wow!  I couldn’t believe it and I still can’t.  I ran into a friend from Tokyo at Borders?!  The scene was like straight from a movie.  I kept looking over, trying not to stare, trying to figure out why this person looked familiar.  When he caught my gaze his eyes popped open and it was a complete NUH – UH moment.  Absolute craziness.

He had a little bit of time to chat and it felt so good to spend even just a few minutes with a person from my past life.  He asked me what souvenirs he should bring back for people in Japan (and for himself), so I went through a list of my favorite things that aren’t available over there… like twix.  And hair products.  Then I couldn’t help myself, I started reminiscing about some of the things I dearly miss about Tokyo – especially my umbrella, and the general appreciation of umbrella aesthetics that abounds in Tokyo.  It was so great to see him.  I’m a little jealous that he gets to go back and see a mutual friend of ours but I’m still 100% happy with my decision to come home.

PR 3: Menswear! November 28, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in Project Runway, fashion.
add a comment

Heidi & Co. over at Project Runway have really set the bar high for challenges this season. This week the challenge was to design menswear – and not just for any man, for a football player!

At first I felt bad for the client, Tiki Barber, because I didn’t think any of the designers would know what to do. This is a womenswear contest, after all. I of course felt bad for the designers, like this challenge was the equivalent of a hit below the belt. Later, watching the designers I was amazed at how many were struggling. Well, that’s not true. I wasn’t amazed; I felt vindicated that this was an unfair challenge. Relative to any/every other PR episode that I’ve seen, everybody was a hot mess for this one! Not only did Carmen not make a shirt (and get sent home for it), 2 of the top 3 designs weren’t even finished! Kevin pinned his vest closed and Jack glued on his buttons. I understand the judges and producers’ desire to keep designers on their toes, but this went overboard.

At first I thought Kit should have won over Jack because her outfit* looked more interesting to me, but thinking more about it I agree that Jack rightfully won the challenge. Tiki did say his style was more conservative and that he liked details so for him Jack’s outfit was better; although I would definitely like to dress some of the men that I know in Christian’s outfit. It was super creative but still looked good. I was sad to see Carmen go but I wasn’t surprised. While fabric, fit and color choices are crucial to an outfit’s success, craftsmanship and even more so completion, are the number one requirements to not getting Auf’d.

*These aren’t links to each individual outfit. You have to scroll through the looks and check the designer’s name at the bottom to see what belongs to who.

PR, 2: Let Them Have Bitten! November 25, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in Project Runway, fashion.
add a comment

It’s only the 2nd episode and people are already getting emotional. Who are the softies? Ricky, Chris and Carmen.

Ricky was really shaken up about being in the bottom two after the first round of judging and speaking to the camera about his desire to do better, broke into tears.

Chris got weepy upon the entrance of the week’s fashion icon, later explaining that she and her famous show are the reason he moved to New York city.

Carmen, bless her heart, broke down at the moment of truth. When asked by Heidi if another contestant should be kicked off instead of her, her face wrinkled up and tears streamed down.

*

This week’s guest judge was the fashion icon Sarah Jessica Parker; the challenge was to design an outfit for her retail line, Bitten. The crux of the challenge was that the two-piece outfits had to retail for no more than $40, necessitating that designers spend no more than $15 on materials. I really appreciated that the designers had to make clothes that could retail in a reasonable range. This speaks to what I think are the two biggest problems in fashion today – prices can be prohibitively expensive, and even when women have money for it clothes are often unflattering to women of larger sizes or less-than-perfect proportions. So fashion is often inaccessible to everyday people – in terms of price and fit – yet designers do little to nothing about it and then complain when people who can’t afford $500 for a pretty top spend $35 for the closest approximation that $35 can buy. Project Runway can be a great platform to address these issues. Case in point, last season the designers had to design for each other’s mothers, which resulted in many a plus-size outfit… and most of the designers failed miserably. And watching interviews from past PR winners it seems as though while the seed money to start a new clothing line is great, these designers still have great difficulty launching a line. I think it’s because their market is already saturated. There are hundreds, thousands of talented designers selling at high-end price points. There are not hundreds of talented designers selling at reasonable price points. But I digress. I really appreciate that the designers had to make clothes that could retail affordably, and when SJP discussed their sketches she made sure that women of all sizes would be able to wear it. As she said, “fashion should not be a luxury and quality should not be a privilege.” Spoken like a true icon.

*

Making his rounds of the work room Tim Gunn advised Christian that his outfit looked too 80s, and Christian said he thought it was perfect… I couldn’t believe that somebody would flat out reject Tim’s advice this early in the competition. As Michael Kors said during the judging, “he did exactly what he wanted.” Unfortunately, it wasn’t what anybody else wanted. I find it interesting that both Tim Gunn and the judging panel thought that Christian (and partner Carmen)’s creation was too retro. Christian is only 21, and so was probably mostly dressed in onesies and matching baby outfits in the 80s. That’s not his fault, of course but that just means that he had a different reference point in his head, as SJP pointed out. They both saw his sketch but were liking it for completely different reasons. As all of the judges and at least half of the contestants are at least a decade older than him I wonder if he will start taking more advice or keep sticking to his youthful guns.

 

The elimination was between Christian, who had a bad design, and Marion who had a bad designer and bad construction – a serious double whammy in the world of the runway. In the end Marion got Auf’d; a decision that didn’t surprise me, and apparently it didn’t surprise him either. Victoria won the challenge, and while I liked her (and Keith’s) outfit I would actually prefer to wear the dress created by Elisa with Sweet P. It was more colorful, more interesting than the drab but well styled tent dress from Victoria and Keith; I understand why she won but I think the judges could have done more to reward creativity and risk-taking.

The Las Vegas Debates November 20, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in politics.
1 comment so far

Last Thursday night the Democratic presidential hopefuls convened at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas – Dodd, Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Kucinich, and Biden.

There’s been so much Edwards/Obama vs. Clinton hype the sparks flew as soon as the debate opened. Apparently people were watching Hillary to see how she reacted to barbs from the boys, and the duo to see how aptly they could gain an edge over Lady Clinton. That’s a tough line to walk and they kind of went overboard in the beginning. As Edwards expressed it later, ‘it’s not personal. The voters need to know the difference between the candidates.’ That’s a good point. People often complain that they can’t tell candidates apart, but then when they try to point out differences they get lambasted for not focusing on the issues.

Overall I felt like Edwards and Biden stood out with good policies and clear heads. Obama got bogged down when he tried to spar with Hillary but overall I think his attitude and perspective came out very clear and that’s where I think his strengths lie.

On to the issues…

Energy – Obama got a question about nuclear waste deposits in Yucca Mountain, not excessively far from Las Vegas. Apparently Obama voted against it and one of the audience members asked him where they should put it. That was a good question, and this speaks to one of my probems with Obama, that he’s not progressive enough on alternative energy sources. The conversation went something like this:
audience member – you voted against depositing nuclear waste in Yucca mountain and while your home state, Illinois, gets 40% of its energy from nuclear power you don’t want to put it in your backyard either. So, if not in your backyard, whose?
Obama – I think we can come up with new technology to deal with this.
Wolf Blitzer – but what if we can’t? Or at least what do you do until that point?
Obama – I take issue with the fact that you keep asking what if we can’t. I think we can. I wouldn’t be in this race if I didn’t think we could solve these problems.

That’s why I love Obama, but I’m still not sure about him. He’s right that there are solutions to problem that people think are intractable. He is, however, not visionary enough when it comes to energy and the environment. In my opinion supporting nuclear energy is wrong. Instead of putting a lot of resources into developing new technology to handle nuclear waste so that we can create more, we should certainly address the existing problem of nuclear waste but also put resources into renewable energy sources so that dealing with excessive waste and pollution as an energy byproduct becomes a thing of the past. Right attitude, wrong solution.

Dodd, bless his heart, was the sole candidate who emphasized that the American people would have to make sacrifices to acheive energy independence. 

Abortion – There was another outstanding one-off comment from Kucinich later on.  The question was about ensuring the placement of a pro-abortion justice on the Supreme Court and while all the candidates supported Roe v. Wade and the right to privacy, Kucinich was the only one who even mentioned the importance of birth control, pre-natal care, post-natal care, and the role they should play in the abortion debate.  That was quite possibly the sanest and most respectable answer I heard all evening.

I (obviously) didn’t take copious notes, and I’m sure there is a lot I forgot in the 5 or so days it took me to finish this post, but there is one more anecdote I’d like to share, on the subject of war.  I don’t remember who, but one candidate talked about how it’s great that candidates learn from their mistakes when endorsing policies, etc, but how wonderful things could be if candidates got their answers right ‘the first time.’  Case in point (mine, not his) Hillary Clinton approved the war in Iraq from the beginning while Obama had the forethought to vote against it.  That’s important.  At this point most of the war’s former supports now see it as a mistake… but what would the world be like if politicians and policy-makers had gotten that right the first time? 

Well, what’s done is done but that doesn’t mean lessons can’t be learned.  Even Hillary, who often seems to me to be the most centrist of the candidates, declared a number of times that democrats need to have the courage to “stand up” to Bush and Cheney.  One of the questions posed from the audience was essentially ‘what does it look like to learn the lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan?  What can be done to prevent the same mistakes from being committed?’  Both Biden and Edwards highlighted a recent vote in the Senate to designate the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist organization.  That’s the first step towards starting a war against Iran; a designation supported by Bush, Cheney and the neo-cons.  Biden voted against this (Obama couldn’t vote because he was on the campaign trail).  Hilary… who urges democrats to stand up to the neo-cons… voted in favor of the resolution.  That’s a great illustration of why I don’t trust her and why I fully support highlighting the differences between candidates.

Project Runway Season 4! November 15, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in Project Runway, fashion.
add a comment

Tonight was the season opener of Project Runway, Season 4. As is expected they put together a cast of visually interesting contestants, complete with at least two (2!) asymmetrical haircuts.

Interesting moments: in the opening montage of video introductions Kevin felt the need to state that he is straight. Is this a first for PR? …in the beginning the contestants had to race to the fabric. Ricky said that he ran “like a Mexican immigrant running to the border.” …once she chose her fabric Elisa wanted to “imbue it with a natural element” and she used “grass stain as a method.” Basically she took really expensive fabric and rubbed it in the grass. Whatever floats her boat. I actually would have liked to see it as a finished product, but I imagine that she probably just ruined the material. …When the 1am deadline was approaching an unidentified male voice (not Kevin) called out “don’t go into the fear box, people! Don’t go into the fear box!”

Simone was the first to go (watch the exit video). The judges had two complaints – the design and construction of her outfit. I agreed with the latter. She presented a nice idea but she wasn’t able to construct it well – and that is often a deal-breaker on PR. In last year’s season opener the first contestant to be sent home had the same issue; she just couldn’t sew fast enough or well enough. That’s a legitimate issue on this show. There’s no space or time to learn how to be a better seamstress. As for her design, I didn’t see a problem with it. Yes, it was simple, but it was also clean and minimalist. It was far less dramatic than most of the other designs, but you could say the same thing of a Jil Sander or Narcisso Rodriguez collection showing against a Marc Jacobs or John Galliano. The color combination on her dress was nice, although I do have to admit – the printed bolero did the rest of the outfit a disservice.

So far my top people are:
VICTORYA - she graduated from the University of Chicago (represent!) and created a beautiful, albeit very restrictive, dress. She is also from Seoul, one of my favorite cities.
CARMEN - she is from Charlotte, NC, and one of the people with asymmetrical hair.
STEVEN - I liked what he created, and not only is he from Chicago, right before Project Runway he worked at the Museum of Science and Industry in Hyde Park!
CHRIS - he created an absolutely gorgeous dark purple dress with a printed collar that tied at the back of the neck. He’s from San Francisco, which is cool, but not as meaningful as if he were from say, San Jose.

I’ll be doing this every week, same that time same that channel. ^_^ Until next time, here are some PR links to keep you busy:
the Project Runway homepage (on Bravo)
Blogging Project Runway
Fafarazzi.com, the PR fantasy game

“Our moment is now”* November 12, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in politics.
1 comment so far

Barack Obama’s Address to the Jefferson Jackson Dinner 2007
Veterans Memorial Auditorium
Des Moines, Iowa
November 10, 2007

Thank you so much. To the great Governor of Iowa and Lieutenant Governor of Iowa. To my dear friend Tom Harkin for the outstanding work that he does. To the congressional delegation of Iowa that is doing outstanding work, and to Nancy Pelosi, Madam Speaker — thank you all for the wonderful welcome and the wonderful hospitality.

A little less than one year from today, you will go into the voting booth, and you will select the President of the United States of America.

Now, here’s the good news — the name George W. Bush will not be on the ballot. The name of my cousin Dick Cheney will not be on the ballot. (We’ve been trying to hide that for a long time. Everybody has a black sheep in the family.) The era of Scooter Libby justice, and Brownie incompetence, and Karl Rove politics will finally be over.

But the question you’re going to have to ask yourself when you caucus in January and you vote in November is, “What’s next for America?”

We are in a defining moment in our history. Our nation is at war. The planet is in peril. The dream that so many generations fought for feels as if it’s slowly slipping away. We are working harder for less. We’ve never paid more for health care or for college. It’s harder to save, and it’s harder to retire. And most of all, we’ve lost faith that our leaders can or will do anything about it.

We were promised compassionate conservatism, and all we got was Katrina and wiretaps. We were promised a uniter, and we got a President who could not even lead the half of the country that voted for him. We were promised a more ethical and more efficient government, and instead we have a town called Washington that is more corrupt and more wasteful than it was before. And the only mission that was ever accomplished is to use fear and falsehood to take this country to a war that should have never been authorized and should have never been waged.

It is because of these failures that America is listening, intently, to what we say here today — not just Democrats, but Republicans and Independents who’ve lost trust in their government but want to believe again.

And it is because of these failures that we not only have a moment of great challenge, but also a moment of great opportunity. We have a chance to bring the country together in a new majority — to finally tackle problems that George Bush made far worse but that had festered long before George Bush ever took office — problems that we’ve talked about year after year after year after year.

And that is why the same old Washington textbook campaigns just won’t do in this election. That’s why not answering questions because we are afraid our answers won’t be popular just won’t do. That’s why telling the American people what we think they want to hear instead of telling the American people what they need to hear just won’t do. Triangulating and poll-driven positions because we’re worried about what Mitt or Rudy might say about us just won’t do. If we are really serious about winning this election, Democrats, we can’t live in fear of losing it.

This party — the party of Jefferson and Jackson, of Roosevelt and Kennedy — has always made the biggest difference in the lives of the American people when we led, not by polls, but by principle; not by calculation, but by conviction; when we summoned the entire nation to a common purpose — a higher purpose. And I run for the Presidency of the United States of America because that’s the party America needs us to be right now.

A party that offers not just a difference in policies, but a difference in leadership.

A party that doesn’t just focus on how to win but why we should.

A party that doesn’t just offer change as a slogan, but real, meaningful change — change that America can believe in.

That’s why I’m in this race. That’s why I am running for the Presidency of the United States of America — to offer change that we can believe in.

I am in this race to tell the corporate lobbyists that their days of setting the agenda in Washington are over. I have done more than any other candidate in this race to take on lobbyists — and won. They have not funded my campaign; they will not get a job in my White House; and they will not drown out the voices of the American people when I am President.

I’m in this race to take those tax breaks away from companies that are moving jobs overseas and put them in the pockets of hard working Americans who deserve it. And I won’t raise the minimum wage every ten years — I will raise it to keep pace so that workers don’t fall behind.

That is why I am in it. To protect the American worker. To fight for the American worker.

I’m in this race because I want to stop talking about the outrage of 47 million Americans without health care and start actually doing something about it. I expanded health care in Illinois by bringing Democrats and Republicans together. By taking on the insurance industry. And that is how I will make certain that every single American in this country has health care they can count on. And I won’t do it twenty years from now. I won’t do it ten years from now. I will do it by the end of my first term as President of the United States of America.

I run for President to make sure that every American child has the best education that we have to offer — from the day they are born to the day they graduate from college. And I won’t just talk about how great teachers are — as President, I will reward them for their greatness — by raising salaries and giving them more support. That’s why I’m in this race.

I am running for President because I am sick and tired of Democrats thinking that the only way to look tough on national security is by talking, and acting, and voting like George Bush Republicans.

When I am this party’s nominee, my opponent will not be able to say that I voted for the war in Iraq; or that I gave George Bush the benefit of the doubt on Iran; or that I supported Bush-Cheney policies of not talking to leaders that we don’t like. And he will not be able to say that I wavered on something as fundamental as whether or not it is OK for America to torture — because it is never ok. That’s why I am in it.

As President, I will end the war in Iraq. We will have our troops home in sixteen months. I will close Guantanamo. I will restore habeas corpus. I will finish the fight against Al Qaeda. And I will lead the world to combat the common threats of the 21st century — nuclear weapons and terrorism; climate change and poverty; genocide and disease. And I will send once more a message to those yearning faces beyond our shores that says, “You matter to us. Your future is our future. And our moment is now.”

America, our moment is now.

Our moment is now.

I don’t want to spend the next year or the next four years re-fighting the same fights that we had in the 1990s.

I don’t want to pit Red America against Blue America; I want to be the President of the United States of America.

And if those Republicans come at me with the same fear-mongering and swift-boating that they usually do, then I will take them head on. Because I believe the American people are tired of fear and tired of distractions and tired of diversions. We can make this election not about fear, but about the future. And that won’t just be a Democratic victory; that will be an American victory.

And that is a victory America needs right now.

I am not in this race to fulfill some long-held ambitions or because I believe it’s somehow owed to me. I never expected to be here. I always knew this journey was improbable. I’ve never been on a journey that wasn’t.

I am running in this race because of what Dr. King called “the fierce urgency of now.” Because I believe that there’s such a thing as being too late. And that hour is almost upon us.

I don’t want to wake up four years from now and find out that millions of Americans still lack health care because we couldn’t take on the insurance industry.

I don’t want to see that the oceans have risen a few more inches. The planet has reached a point of no return because we couldn’t find a way to stop buying oil from dictators.

I don’t want to see more American lives put at risk because no one had the judgment or the courage to stand up against a misguided war before we sent our troops into fight.

I don’t want to see homeless veterans on the streets. I don’t want to send another generation of American children to failing schools. I don’t want that future for my daughters. I don’t want that future for your sons. I do not want that future for America.

I’m in this race for the same reason that I fought for jobs for the jobless and hope for the hopeless on the streets of Chicago; for the same reason I fought for justice and equality as a civil rights lawyer; for the same reason that I fought for Illinois families for over a decade.

Because I will never forget that the only reason that I’m standing here today is because somebody, somewhere stood up for me when it was risky. Stood up when it was hard. Stood up when it wasn’t popular. And because that somebody stood up, a few more stood up. And then a few thousand stood up. And then a few million stood up. And standing up, with courage and clear purpose, they somehow managed to change the world.

That’s why I’m running, Iowa — to give our children and grandchildren the same chances somebody gave me.

That’s why I’m running, Democrats — to keep the American Dream alive for those who still hunger for opportunity, who still thirst for equality.

That’s why I’m asking you to stand with me; that’s why I’m asking you to caucus for me; that’s why I am asking you to stop settling for what the cynics say we have to accept. In this election — in this moment — let us reach for what we know is possible. A nation healed. A world repaired. An America that believes again. Thank you very much everybody.

———-

*the subject of an email sent by info@barackobama.com

Nova Numbers November 11, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in Nova.
add a comment

Here are a few figures:
¥ 255,608 – what Nova owes me
¥ 199,064 – the amount “deposited” into my account (¥199,063 to go!)

Why are the amounts different?  My raise seems to have been nullified, and there is a mysterious ¥48,000 tax on my paystub (as well as a couple of other dubious entries).  So whether or not Nova went bankrupt they were going to screw me anyway.

As for the latest in bankruptcy developments… I have no idea what’s going on.  Some friends have sent me information but I’m too scared/too disgusted to check and see what’s going on.  If you’re one of my readers who is keeping up with the situation please feel free to comment!

Ma ha matzav? November 11, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in Back in the U.S.A..
1 comment so far

Earlier today a friend in Israel (I heart gchat) asked me this question:
“ma ha matzav itach?”
which means, ‘what’s going on,’ ‘what’s your situation’ or ‘what’s happening in your world’ in Hebrew.

Well. My situation of late has been kind of wierd. I’ve been feeling very wierd lately. Distracted, but not busy. Ambitous but not motivated. I have ideas and desires but absolutely no sense of direction.

I’m sure part of this is general re-adjustment malaise. A couple of friends gave me advice about this before I left. Both people had taught with Nova, returned to the U.S. and then come back to Japan. One told me that when I got home I would be really depressed because living abroad is a challenge but living at home is so easy so I might feel like I’m not accomplishing anything. I think part of that certainly is true for me. Tokyo was so stimulating – overwhelming at times – but generally I loved the energy. Chapel Hill is… not. This is such a low density area. Everybody drives! There is so much open space, so many strip malls. In Tokyo buildings and people were packed very closely and the trains and buses went just about anywhere. I loved walking, using my bicycle and riding public transportation. I can’t do that here and that bothers me. I’d love to ride my bicycle around town but I don’t have the stamina for that and I wouldn’t feel safe on all the roads. I can walk to a Borders bookstore which is great, but that’s about it. Chapel Hill offers free buses which is fantastic but the area where I live has pretty limited service. So I end up driving just about everywhere and I DON’T feel good about that. I hate that I have to drive – for a lot of reasons – but there’s no way around it.

I think the other part of my malaise has to do with Nova. There’s just no way around it… I had a plan, I had direction – then I lost a month’s pay and that completely stripped me of the resources I would have used to execute my plan. So it’s like, what now??? Nova owes me $2500-$3000. Under the current circumstances it’s going to take quite some time for me to earn that back (with my 2 part time jobs). And on top of that I have student debt that I must pay off every month regardless of how much I make. I constantly feel frustrated and defeated. I’m not severely unhappy in Chapel Hill but it’s certainly not where I had planned to be. I wanted to return to Chicago soon after Tokyo for a reason (many reasons) and my feelings about that haven’t changed.

But I’m here… indefinitely? My goal is still to move back to Chicago but it’s difficult to hold on to that idea when I’m not even making enough money to support myself… let alone move halfway across the country.
::sigh::

So there you have it… that’s my matzav. Hope yours is better!

November 8, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in Back in the U.S.A..
2 comments

I am seriously lacking in motivation right now. It’s not even that I’m still distracted by tv. I don’t know what it is… I just can’t bring myself to do anything. I would like to write – I know that a lot has been happening with Nova – in general there are things happening in my life and the world at-large that I would like to cover. But, well… I just can’t seem to get myself to do anything productive. Maybe this is part of adjusting to life back in the States?

Adding Insult to Injury November 4, 2007

Posted by adelle387 in Nova.
add a comment

I got a paystub from Nova in the mail. It claims that money has been deposited into my account. I was 99% sure that wasn’t true but I checked my account anyway. I was wrong! There was more money there than before… ¥1! Yeah, I have one yen more. That doesn’t even have the value of a penny. Thanks Nova! That wasn’t the insult.

Even though I got a raise before I left Nova this paycheck was far less than I usually get. It’s not exactly clear to me where the money went or why but it seems like it has something to do with taxes. I’m taxed every month, why would you take a lump sum out of the last paycheck? Especially when I was told that once I left Japan I wouldn’t be able to get my Japanese tax return it seems strange and hugely unfair to take out money you know I can’t get back. It doesn’t make sense for me to take a huge amount of money out of a person’s pay just because it’s the last paycheck from the company. I could understand taking it out when a person leaves the country if there is a mechanism in place for people to recoup that amount after they’ve left. But to tell people that they can’t get the money back and then take it out anyway? That’s greedy, exploitative and just wrong. Thanks Nova! Thanks Japan! Wow, you’re leaving such a good impression.

It amazes me how messed up this situation continues to get, how far the impact reaches, and again, how messed it up it continues to get. I can’t access Let’sJapan.Org right now but when I last checked it the latest developments showed some kind of Sahashi-yakuza connection and apparently he embezzled money from Nova and transfered it into his private company. There is one nugget of good news, the American press has finally caught on to the story. The Wall Street Journal asks, “How do you say ‘taken for a ride’” in Japanese?